Three reasons why poverty and pandemic shouldn’t be blamed for worsening illiteracy in the United States
Educators often cite poverty as an excuse for increasing illiteracy in the country. But studies show poverty inspires a person to succeed. On the other hand, evidence shows it’s the reading curriculum, broken family, and lack of classroom discipline are to blame. [Calkins is failed; Wisman, Hammer]
Combined with trillions of mounting debt, tent cities, and relentless crime, the future of America is ambiguous as Gen Z, whose literacy is failing, takes over its politics and economy.
1. Literacy has been declining before the pandemic
The USA has a severe and unprecedented illiteracy problem, and the media blames the pandemic. But literacy has been declining for decades.
According to the U.S. Department of Education, 54% of U.S. adults 16-74 years old read below the equivalent of a sixth-grade level. [Forbes]
What happened in the last four decades?
In the 1940s, only four percent of Americans were considered illiterate. But by 1990, that number had doubled to 8 percent.
Earlier in the 1980s, a new literacy standard was set to help improve those who could not read at all or could only read a little.
Literacy rose from 15% to 20%, with 67% American literacy, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics but by the 1990s, it was on a downtrend.
Lowering standard in 2016
For decades, there has been no significant improvement in SAT scores (critical reading) for Whites, Blacks, Native Americans, or Hispanic, except for Asians, whose SAT scores continue to improve.
The College Board, which administers the SAT exam, made changes to the SAT scoring system in 2016 to address declining SAT scores for the last half a century.
|YEAR||SAT SCORE||YEAR||SAT SCORE|
|1972||530||2017*||533 (Start of lower standard)|
Lower SAT standards to accommodate declining scores
|SAT SCORING||OLD SCORE||NEW SCORE|
|Score range||600-2400||↓ 400-1600|
|Total questions/task||171||↓ 154 (optional essay)|
|Guessing penalty||Minus 1/4 point/incorrect||↓ Removed|
|75th percentile “good score”||1480||↓ 1060|
|50th percentile “average score”||1720||↓ 1200|
|Poor score||1260||↓ 920|
No improvements since 1992
Since 1992, there has been no significant score improvement in reading, writing, and comprehension. Instead, recent data show the average reading performance of fourth and eighth graders declined from 2017 to 2019. [NRC; NAEP]
- In 2014, the first edition of Lucy Calkin’s K-2 Units of Study in Reading was introduced. She believes kids are natural readers, but data show that’s not the case.
- Since 2017, there has been a significant change in the percentage of fourth-grade students at or above Proficient in reading compared to 2015. The American literacy rate was already at a low 79%. during this period. [NAEP] [Gallup]
- In 2019, a third of all fourth graders still can’t read at a basic level. Most students are inept readers even after graduating from high school. [APM]
- By 2021, Gallup data show 54% of Americans (16 to 74 years old) read below the 6th-grade level. [B. Bush foundation]
The point is that Illiteracy in the USA has been diving even before the pandemic, while global adult literacy increased to 86.7 % in 2020 with an average annual rate of 0.36%. [Knoema]
In 2022, reading scores regressed to their lowest levels because of the pandemic lockdown.
HOW IPAD WORSENED ILLITERACY IN THE USA.
2. Poverty drives a person to succeed
Poverty and racism have always been blamed for poor school performance in the U.S., but in Asian cultures, poverty inspires literacy.
Asians in poverty are exceptions to the consensus
Immigrants whose mother tongue is not English have difficulty understanding the medium of instruction—except Asians. Despite language barriers, Asians do very well in school.
The same “Asian rank” is similar across public high schools in the United States. In fact, Asians are the most educated group in America. [Palasek, PNAS, Census]
The economic woes of an Asian immigrant
- Even if Asian immigrants brought with them money to the U.S., the conversation rate decreased the value of their savings.
- Even for college graduates, immigrants are underemployed or in low-paying jobs unless they can afford to update their education.
- Despite the odds, many Asian immigrants succeed because they bring with them the values, discipline, and determination that are keys to success—whether for economic or academic gain.
No Excuse: Poor Asian countries show an upward trend in literacy
Case study: Poverty and academics
According to data, poverty correlates strongly with academic results. Families with comfortable incomes usually have higher scores in the United States [ACT 2015]
For example, in the four buildings of Glenbard District in Illinois, the West and South buildings have high ratings in terms of grades and character behavior compared to the East and North.
Glenbard’s East and North buildings have a more significant immigrant population, mainly at the low-income level.
I observed similar attributes in Wheaton, Hindsdale, and La Grange high school districts. They’re in upscale neighborhoods with fewer low-income immigrants and good school ratings.
But does it really tell the whole story?
Case study: Filipino immigrants
- In poorer southeast Asian countries like the Philippines, poverty is often correlated with poor grades.
- The poverty level in the Philippines since 2000 has been an average of 40% as compared to the USA, with only 12%.
- About 92 percent of Filipinos 10 to 64 years old are functionally literate. [PSA, 2019]
Filipino immigrants came from a country with inadequate academic support when comparing it to the U.S. Still, Filipino-Americans (from immigrant families) rank higher in ACT/SAT compared to Whites.
Filipino immigrants who move to the United States often excel in their grades for two reasons:
- The U.S. curriculum is easier compared to the Asian system.
- Poverty drives Asian immigrants to do well in their education.
Case study: Asian Americans from India
South Asia accounted for 29% of the people living in extreme poverty worldwide (216 million extremely poor in South Asia out of the estimated 736 million extremely poor worldwide). [World Bank]
- Four out of five extremely poor in the South Asia region resided in India, according to harmonized variables covering 1993-2017 by SARMD.
- Indian Americans (not native Americans) are among the most highly educated racial or ethnic groups in the U.S. [Pew]
- Indian immigrants in the U.S. continually outpace every other ethnic group socioeconomically, per U.S. Census statistics.[IANS, 2009]
- Americans with Indian roots account for at least 29.5% of the total physician population. [AAPI]
U.S. literacy vs. Asia
Asian literacy, in contrast to the USA, has shown NO significant score improvement in reading, writing, and comprehension since 1992. On the other hand, data show that the literacy rate has been on an upward trend in Asia since the 1970s. [Index Mundi]
Academic excellence typically translates into better socioeconomic status, but of course, there is also income inequality among Asians.
Socioeconomic inequality among Asians
Academic excellence usually converts to higher income. However, the uptrend in Asians’ socioeconomic status is not shared by all Asians. Noticeably, as Asians get absorbed into the general American populace’s norms, they also become complacent.
For example, income inequality among Asians in the U.S. nearly doubled from 1970 to 2016. Evidently, some second or third-generation Asians have lost certain values necessary for academic excellence.
Asian literacy proves poverty should not be blamed
The bottom line, poverty is never an excuse for bad behavior in class. Although poverty is often associated with poor academics, other factors contribute to America’s education dilemma—rooted in policies and ideologies.
Asian literacy (ages 15-24) from 1974 to 2020
3. Broken family, not poverty
In 2021, 19.5% of African Americans lived below the poverty line, while 17% of Hispanic (mostly legal immigrants) are also impoverished. Both ethnicities score lowest in standardized tests. [Statista] [Ballard]
However, Asian immigrants, which are mostly from intact families and non-native English speakers, score the highest on standardized tests and lowest in the FBI crime index but suffer the most hate crimes in recent years.
Correlation between broken homes and poverty
Almost half of Americans experience poverty—following a divorce. [J. Health]
Correlation between intact family and academics
Fathers are more likely to get A’s in school. [NRFC]
Correlation between broken homes and poor academics
- Children from lower-income households score significantly lower on vocabulary, communication skills, math, concentration, and cooperativeness. [Thomas]
- Fatherless children are twice as likely to drop out of high school than children with both parents at home. [Census 2021]
- 71% of all high school dropouts come from fatherless homes – 9 times the average. [NPAR]
- Broken families experience lower levels of educational achievement which becomes an expanding cycle.
- Children from broken homes have little or no interest in learning materials. Instead, they carry emotional frustration from home to school. [Research Wrap]
- One-parent children lack self-control and may become disruptive in class instead of paying attention. [Hetherington, Cox, Cos, 1982]
Fathers who are involved are more likely to get A’s in school.
4. Poverty is incentivized in the United States
Poverty drives a person to succeed, but in America, it is incentivized. Recent policies also gave way to social justice ideologies that incentivize groups of people because of their color.
In Democrat-led states like Chicago, criminals are free to go if they can’t afford bail. Likewise, drug users, common in tent cities, are incentivized by giving free drug syringes, and free food, instead of arrest.
Poor, mentally deranged people on the street roam free in Democrat-run cities like California. It used to be that these people were caught, placed in asylums, and treated, but these facilities were deinstitutionalized in the 1980s.
Effects of incentivized poverty
The current Food Stamp probably discourages marriage and rewards single parenthood. About 85% of aid goes to children with single-parent or no-parent families. Thus, incentivizing poverty and other means-tested aid programs, in effect, penalize marriage.
Effects of incentivized poverty on education outcomes:
- Young women raised in families dependent on welfare are two to three times more likely to drop out and fail to graduate from high school than are young women of similar race and socioeconomic backgrounds not raised on welfare. [Forste, Tienda]
- The more years a child spends on welfare, the lower the child’s I.Q. by as much as 20%, according to former CBO Director Dr. June O’Neill. [Heritage]
- A study by Mary Corcoran and Roger Gordon of the University of Michigan shows that welfare negatively affects the long-term employment and earnings capacity of young boys.
- The more welfare income received by a family while a boy was growing up, the lower the boy’s earnings as an adult. [Forste, Tienda]
Effects of incentivized poverty on single parents:
According to conservative author Candice Owens, broken families are the main reason for Black poverty, along with bad behavior and school fallout associated with it.
- Children raised by never-married mothers have significantly more behavior problems than those raised by biological parents. [Pew]
- Children raised by never-married mothers were seven times more likely to be poor compared to those with intact families. [Marripedia]
- Studies show single parenthood and academic performance are associated. [NCBI]
The bottom line, ideologies are shaping a lazy generation
Leaders, especially from blue states, are weaponizing ultra-liberal ideologies to create policies that give birth to an entitled generation—and it is producing a lazy generation.